Skip to main content

Safer Internet Day 2017





It's a bit of a misleading title really. Shouldn't we be safe on the internet every day? Shouldn't we be teaching internet safety all of the time - not just for one day a year? Of course we should, and of course we do. However, Safer Internet Day provides schools with an opportunity to talk to pupils about a specific focus or area of internet safety, and the UK Safer Internet Centre provides schools with lots of age-appropriate resources, assemblies, and talking points to discuss with students of all ages.

I visited Charles Read Academy last week and along with Miss King, ran sessions for Year 7 pupils centred around the power of image. We were joined by governors and school leaders, which provided a great opportunity to talk about the power of online images from all viewpoints and age ranges.



Much of the discussion centred around 'selfies' - and the difference, if any, of the type of selfies posted by boys and girls. Of course we were generalising, but talk of filters, pouts, collecting likes and showing off filled the room - especially when we split into boy and girl groups for discussing the topic.


What was consistent though, and not specific to gender, was the opinion that we should all be careful what we post. Our discussions lead us to matching consequences to actions, and what happens if we post the wrong type of image. One of the adults shared a story about how his son was asked in a job interview about the song he had sung and posted on YouTube - the employer had 'Googled' him before the job interview. This highlighted to pupils the fact that no matter how temporary the app or fleeting the image on a social media account, whatever you post can be, and will be, online forever - our digital footprint.

Throughout the lessons, we talked about the need to use a 'moral compass' - because sometimes it's not as easy as right or wrong. Every online decision, just like in real life, often requires judgement calls that aren't necessarily black or white, right or wrong - and the need for a moral compass helps guide us through the decision making process, especially when deciding on posting images online.

We decided that a general, and very useful guide to what we should post online included:

Do I have permission from everyone in the image?
Would my parents/teacher be happy with me if they saw this image?
Will this image upset anyone?
Are my privacy settings locked?
Is my image misleading?
This image will be around forever. Will I be happy with that in 10 years?

And of course, as with most things online - if in doubt, ask a responsible adult.

The pupils at Charles Read were engaging, thoughtful and inquisitive. They contributed to our lively discussions and were eloquent in their responses - many had experiences of sharing images online, and were very reflective when sharing their experiences. They listened to each other and were respectful of others' opinions.

For us adults, it's important to remember that just like in real life, children do make mistakes. It's reassuring to know that there are organisations like the UK Safer Internet Centre who provide resources, help and guidance to help children and young people stay safe online.

If you have any questions or comments, or would like some advice on anything related to online safety, then please get in touch.

For all of the UK Safer Internet Centre resources, click here
If you are worried or feel unsafe about something online, visit Ceops website here






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jamboard - New Tool

Jamboard has been around for a while as a high-end piece of digital office furniture from Google but the software is now part of G-Suite and therefore available to all dret.cloud users. Staff or students can either go to jamboard.google.com for the web version (which is really only useful for viewing and sharing boards) or use the iOS app available on the Self-Service store. What Jamboard provides is a lovely app to pull different kinds of documents from Google Drive or web pages, move and resize them and annotate over the top with different pen tools or a number of icons. I plan to do a couple of blog posts about Jamboard in the coming days - one about the whole premise behind this kind of software and other comparing it to what up to now have been my go-to pieces of software, Google Keep and Microsoft OneNote. If you'd like to see what Jamboard looks like in action, this (staged) teacher demonstration from Tom Mullaney gives a good overview.

Guest blog post - Pixi Maths

We recently started a new Spring cohort of our Challenge for eLearning CPD course with colleagues from the Corby area, including the author of Pixi Maths , Danielle Moosajee . As a plenary activity for the first session, we used and demo'd Plickers - 'a simple tool that lets teachers collect real-time formative assessment data without the need for student devices.' It's a great tool which we've blogged about before , and here are Danielle's thoughts on it after using it class post-training: I left the first Challenge 4 eLearning session full of biscuits and inspired! In a way, it was a shame that the Easter break fell so shortly afterwards as I was keen to try out some of the things we’d been introduced to. A couple of years ago, a colleague had shown me the Plickers app. Students each receive a QR code with 4 orientations (A, B, C and D) and they hold their cards up to be scanned by an iPad in answer to a multiple choice question. Previously, I had lamin

So External Hard Drives and Pen Drives are going to be banned...

We've taken the decision to ban external hard drives and pen-drives from all Trust computers and from all of our premises with effect from 1st January 2018. From that date they just won't work when you plug them into one of our computers. This article hopefully points the way for how to continue to work successfully without that trusted friend. This could inconvenience people - people that use them and me* Every school still has one or two people that carry everything  to and from work every day on that external disc they bought four or five years ago - I know of one colleague who has more than ten year's material on there, and another that lost everything  when the drive failed and they had no backup. The ban comes from a security review where these devices were identified as one of our highest risks because: From a data protection point of view, we know people know not to put any kind of personal or confidential data onto one, but there is always the risk of human er